Re: runit SIGPWR support

From: innerspacepilot <innerspacepilot_at_gmx.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:29:49 +0300

I would suggest it should be a graceful shutdown ( stopping all daemons,
syncing filesystems and stuff )


On 14.02.2020 13:46, Jeff wrote:
> 12.02.2020, 22:54, "Colin Booth" <colin_at_heliocat.net>:
>> I wasn't trying to be hostile, apologies if it came across that way. As
>> far as I know SIGPWR is a Linux-specific signal so services that are
>> aiming for portability will either need to have special handling for
>> that in the linux case or need to ignore it. Ergo, runit (and all other
>> POSIX-compliant inits) currently have no special handling around SIGPWR
>> as they don't understand what it is.
> what should SIGPWR mean to a Linux init ?
> i would suggest: halt and power down the system ASAP.
>
Received on Fri Feb 14 2020 - 12:29:49 UTC