On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:14:00AM +0000, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Casper Ti. Vector:
>
> > But I do think the capability argument has its validity: chainloading
> > is, at this time, not well known to normal users, which is why many
> > systemd supporters compulsorily identify cgroup support with systemd
> > with few people opposing. Therefore I suggest to add some examples of
> > capacility control (eg. one example for ulimit, plus one example for
> > cgroup) into the comparison page, or an independent page.
> >
> Such "systemd supporters" don't actually know systemd.
>
> * http://jdebp.eu./FGA/linux-control-groups-are-not-jobs.html
>
> To anyone running the service manager and bundles from nosh version 1.28 or
> later on Linux: You are encouraged to look at your control group hierarchy,
> with a tool like "systemd-cgls /", with the "cgroup" field of the ps
> command, or by simply listing your /sys/fs/cgroup/ hierarchy. You are in
> for an interesting surprise.
I have ready your article, and understand it.
Please be more detailed, I am interested, but due to not using
systemd, I ahve nothing in /sys/fs/cgroup
What is the interesting surprise, explained?
Jean
Received on Wed Dec 07 2016 - 09:26:28 UTC