On 21/08/2016 06:18, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> It seems that the exchanging of SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 [1] in s6-linux-init
> did not happen. Is it just forgotten, or ...?
Well, by the point I remembered to make the change, I already had
systems depending on the old behaviour :/
So, all in all, I don't think I'll swap the default meaning after all.
It's purely a convention anyway, and busybox init, sinit and sysvinit all
disagree - so I'm afraid there can't be a generic "shutdown" client;
every init system must come with its own "shutdown" program, that honors
its own convention.
Sorry about that.5
--
Laurent
Received on Sun Aug 21 2016 - 09:15:44 UTC