Avery Payne <avery.p.payne_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> I think the whole idea of "registered namespaces for software packages"
>> is a good idea and should be supported. There are of course different
>> ways of implementing it.
> Why not keep slashpackage as an "alternative" installation method? Is
> there any reason you can't package both "traditional" and "slashpackage"
> methods together?
Anything can be achieved by implementing additional levels of
indirection.
At the moment, I am just interested in whether people (especially people
on this list) believe there is something wrong with slashpackage, and if
so, what it is in particular.
Received on Tue Jun 23 2015 - 10:40:22 UTC